Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2349 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 69 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 122 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
122
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$774
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$774 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |