Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 717 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 16% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 159 vs 137 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 54 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E3-1220 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 69 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
