Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E-2334 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 384 days newer than Xeon E-2334.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2334
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E-2334 - 492 vs 430 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2334 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2334 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2334
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2334
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Single-Core
1722
57.90181573638198%
Multi-Core
5406
26.831447290053607%
Intel Xeon E-2334 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
