Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2314 outperforms Core i7-4710HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2314 is 2717 days newer than Core i7-4710HQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2314
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-4710HQ - 248 vs 225 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2314 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i7-4710HQ
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | Intel Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
