Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2286M outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2286M is 143 days newer than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2286M
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 3700U - 134 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2286M - 15 vs 45 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E-2286M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2286M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
