Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1073 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 152 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
