Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 36 days older than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E-2276M - 235 vs 234 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
235
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$309.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |