Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1736 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 45 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E-2176M - 158 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 24 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$508.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$508.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |