Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2136 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2136 is 752 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 210 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 80 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2136
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
