Key Differences
In short — Pentium G645T outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G645T is 1620 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 4 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
| Pentium | Collection | Phenom X4 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Agena |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
