Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 239 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 15% better in Diablo IV than Pentium G645T - 97 vs 84 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 6 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
72.74590163934425%
Multi-Core
606
38.94601542416453%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
