Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1852 days newer than Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G640 - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 64 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |