Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 855 days older than Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than Pentium G4620 - 184 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
65.25862068965517%
Multi-Core
1599
29.377181701267684%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
