Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Pentium B960 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1072 days newer than Pentium B960.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B960
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium B960 - 175 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B960 - 20 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Oct 2nd, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B960 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |