Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1675 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 4 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core M-5Y51 - 132 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Core M | Collection | Xeon E |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |