Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2012 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 4 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core M-5Y51 - 303 vs 279 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 20 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
303
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$400
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core M | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |