Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1714 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 4 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core M-5Y51 - 112 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 24 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$485
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12714 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |