Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 1714 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 4 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Core M-5Y51 - 169 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 8 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$173.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$173.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |