Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2564 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than FX-4100 - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
