Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 211 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Athlon 3000G - 175 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
66.78297278436845%
Multi-Core
1975
32.94961628294962%
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
