Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 124 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Athlon 200GE - 180 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - CA$145.56 vs CA$458.62
- Up to 66% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-9900KF - CA$0.86 vs CA$2.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.55/FPS
33%
Price, CA$
CA$458.62
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$458.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
170
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$145.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |