Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 245 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - CA$141.17 vs CA$577.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-9900 - CA$0.59 vs CA$2.36 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
245
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.36/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$577.88
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$577.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
238
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |