Key Differences
In short — Core i9-8950HK outperforms Xeon W-2191B on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-8950HK is 102 days newer than Xeon W-2191B.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon W-2191B - 106 vs 103 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2191B doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2191B
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-8950HK - 36 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Server/Workstation • Dec 21st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-8950HK | vs | Intel Xeon W-2191B |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 21st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon W |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 18 |
12 | Threads | 36 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |