Key Differences
In short — Core i9-8950HK outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-8950HK is 214 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 265 vs 259 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-8950HK - 16 vs 12 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
259
97.73584905660377%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
85.75624082232012%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i9-8950HK | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |