Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-7960X vs FX-4350

Core i9-7960X vs FX-4350: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 1586 days newer than FX-4350.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X

  • Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-4350 - 135 vs 127 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads

Advantages of AMD FX-4350

  • Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 125 vs 165 Watts
This is a free version of The Last of Us Part I.
The Last of Us Part I

The Last of Us Part I

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017


FPS

135

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

CA$709.99

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-7960X X-Series 2.8 Ghz 16-Core Lga 2066 Processor 2.8 16 BX80673I97960X

Buy for CA$709.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76124 minutes ago

AMD FX-4350 Logo
FX-4350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013


FPS

127

94.07407407407408%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017

AMD FX-4350 Logo
FX-4350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo
Core i9-7960X

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017


Single-Core

1376

100%

Multi-Core

10496

100%

AMD FX-4350 Logo
FX-4350

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013


Single-Core

469

34.0843023255814%

Multi-Core

1216

11.585365853658537%

Intel Core i9-7960X Logo

Intel Core i9-7960X

vs
AMD FX-4350 Logo

AMD FX-4350

Sep 1st, 2017
Release DateApr 29th, 2013
Core i9CollectionFX
SkylakeCodenameVishera
Intel Socket 2066SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
16
Cores4
32
Threads4
2.8 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz
165 WTDP
125 W
14 nm
Process Size32 nm
28.0x
Multiplier19.5x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.