Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1089 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 131 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 105 vs 165 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
14 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |