Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400F - 168 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$138.05 vs CA$812.73
- Up to 82% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.87 vs CA$4.84 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.84/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$812.73
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$812.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |