Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3332 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Metro Exodus than FX-8320E - 156 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | AMD FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
