Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4459 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 38% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2700K - 216 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$135.68 vs CA$853.06
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$853.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74724 minutes ago
Buy for CA$135.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
21.986754966887418%
Multi-Core
2264
12.391899288451013%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |