Buy on Amazon
CA$853.06
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-2500S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4747 days newer than Core i5-2500S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 32% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-2500S - 192 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500S - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-14900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) up to 5.8 GHz
Buy for CA$853.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76557 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i5-2500S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
586
19.403973509933774%
Multi-Core
1492
8.166392993979201%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500S |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i9-14900F or Core i5-2500S
Battlefield 2042, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
154 FPS
CA$20.13/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Core i9-14900F
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$3,099.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
