Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than Core i3-7100 - 200 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$88.62 vs CA$860.89
- Up to 88% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900F - CA$0.52 vs CA$4.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
200
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.3/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$860.89
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$860.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
172
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$88.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$88.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |