Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Core i3-12100F - 812 vs 761 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$119.0 vs CA$860.89
- Up to 85% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-14900F - CA$0.16 vs CA$1.06 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
812
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$860.89
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$860.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
761
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |