Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-10320 - 238 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
238
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$658
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$658 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1582 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
50.96026490066225%
Multi-Core
4626
25.320197044334975%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |