Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-12900F - 213 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$772.32 vs CA$852.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-14900 - CA$3.82 vs CA$4.0 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4/FPS
95%
Price, CA$
CA$852.99
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$852.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
202
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$772.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$772.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |