Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2321 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 16% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 335 vs 290 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$303.46 vs CA$789.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-14900 - CA$1.05 vs CA$2.36 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
335
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.36/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$789
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10606 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
290
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10599 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |