Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3783 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 34% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3240 - 159 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 150 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
