Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3397 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3250 - 492 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
17.88836583725622%
Multi-Core
1130
5.608497121302363%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
