Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-6900K - 113 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$389.99 vs CA$565.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i9-13900F - CA$3.9 vs CA$5.0 per FPS
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
113
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$565
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 613 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
100
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 606 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |