Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 62% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-10700F - 94 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$357.87 vs CA$669.59
- Up to 13% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-13900F - CA$6.17 vs CA$7.12 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.12/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$669.59
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$669.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
58
61%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$357.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$357.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |