Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-7600 - 134 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$153.92 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 62% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.36 vs CA$3.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.54/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
113
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |