Buy on Amazon
CA$564.18
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1399
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 132 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$564.18 vs CA$1123.99
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 48 vs 32 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
112
84.84848484848484%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1123.99
50%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core, 48-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$1,123.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1667
61.062271062271066%
Multi-Core
13317
77.33898600383297%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 24 | Cores | 24 |
| 32 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
