Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2192 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930 - 479 vs 377 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
22.402358142962417%
Multi-Core
1043
6.349689516619993%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
