Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 22% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G1610 - 546 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
