Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900T outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900T is 1650 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900T
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7551P - 124 vs 98 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900T - 64 vs 24 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-12900T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900T | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | EPYC |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 16 | Cores | 32 |
| 24 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
