Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 426 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$408.98 vs CA$669.59
- Up to 38% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.91 vs CA$3.1 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900K - 216 vs 214 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
214
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$408.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$408.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.1/FPS
61%
Price, CA$
CA$669.59
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$669.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |