Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3643 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3960X - 130 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - CA$469.81 vs CA$500.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3960X - CA$3.61 vs CA$5.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$469.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$469.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Buy for CA$500 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |