Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9350KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1031 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9350KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-9350KF - 205 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - CA$409.0 vs CA$463.02
- Up to 24% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-9350KF - CA$2.0 vs CA$2.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 91 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$409
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10108 minutes ago
Buy for CA$463.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Core i3-9350KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |