Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i7-8086K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1309 days newer than Core i7-8086K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-8086K - 128 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8086K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$618.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$618.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Single-Core
1673
65.89208349743994%
Multi-Core
6973
50.20158387329013%
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i7-8086K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 5th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 40th |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |