Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1608 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 275 vs 255 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$360.9 vs CA$543.37
- Up to 28% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-12900F - CA$1.42 vs CA$1.98 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
275
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.98/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$543.37
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$543.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10058 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
255
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |