Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3220 - 287 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$39.99 vs CA$435.32
- Up to 89% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-11900KF - CA$0.16 vs CA$1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
287
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$435.32
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$435.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
254
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |